Compulsory vaccination through the back door or a logical decision? The decision to cancel the compensation for unvaccinated workers in quarantine triggers divided reactions.
The end of the compensation payments for unvaccinated workers in corona quarantine has met with mixed feedback.
While the German Trade Union Federation (DGB) and the social association VdK opposed the decision of the federal and state health ministers, the municipalities praised it. The chairman of the World Medical Association, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, spoke of a correct measure.
The majority of the health ministers decided on Wednesday that most unvaccinated workers should no longer receive compensation for loss of earnings due to an ordered quarantine by November 1 at the latest. This should apply to everyone for whom there is a vaccination recommendation and who can also be vaccinated. Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU) had declared that it was not about pressure, but also about fairness.
“Compulsory vaccination through the back door” is criticized
The DGB chairman Reiner Hoffmann told the editorial network Germany (RND / Thursday): “It cannot be that politics simply dump responsibility for the fight against the pandemic on the employees. We continue to reject compulsory vaccination through the back door. ” In addition, the new regulation also means that employees must disclose their vaccination status to the employer.
VdK President Verena Bentele also turned against the agreement of the health ministers. «We have huge concerns. This is now somehow a compulsory vaccination through the back door in Germany, “Bentele told the television station Phoenix. There are still quite a few people who do not yet have a certificate for a chronic illness because there are not yet sufficient studies. “And especially for people who are worried about getting vaccinated and not receiving a certificate, the threat to their existence would be very severe.”
Municipalities praise the decision
In contrast, the German Association of Towns and Municipalities praised the decision. “It is an individual decision not to be vaccinated in spite of the existing offer,” said managing director Gerd Landsberg to the newspapers of the Funke media group. “But that also means that you have to bear the consequences of this decision yourself.” There is no reason why the general public should fund the compensation in these cases.
The German Association of Cities also responded positively to the decision. “I think it is right to let the continued payment of loss of earnings in quarantine for unvaccinated people expire,” said President Burkhard Jung (SPD) to the editorial network Germany (Thursday). There is now a vaccination offer for everyone. And according to the Infection Protection Act, compensation is only given in the event of quarantine to those who cannot be vaccinated or if no vaccination is available, said Jung, who is also the mayor of Leipzig. The state should only pay continued wages if there is a good reason for it, for example if someone cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons.
Montgomery: Unvaccinated people face the consequences
The chairman of the World Medical Association, Montgomery, made a similar statement. Those who do not get vaccinated must also bear the consequences of their actions, said Montgomery of the “Augsburger Allgemeine”. The Montgomery believes it is unlikely that employees will circumvent the obligation to quarantine: “Quarantine is a mandatory measure anchored in the Infection Protection Act. You cannot evade it without making yourself liable to prosecution. “
It is correct if, three months after sufficient vaccination offers, financial benefits such as compensating for loss of earnings in quarantine or the costs of testing for unvaccinated people are no longer applicable.
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
