Chancellery chief Helge Braun (CDU) has brought restrictions for unvaccinated and advantages for vaccinated people into play because of the faltering vaccination campaign. This is how the press comments on the debate.
Chancellery Minister Helge Braun (CDU) has brought restrictions for non-vaccinated people into play and thus triggered criticism and skepticism – also in his own party. “People who have been vaccinated will definitely have more freedom than those who have not been vaccinated,” Braun said of “Bild am Sonntag”. In the event of a high infection rate despite test concepts, unvaccinated people would have to reduce their contacts.
The reduction in contacts for unvaccinated people could also mean “that certain offers such as restaurant, cinema and stadium visits would no longer be possible even for tested unvaccinated people because the residual risk is too high,” said Braun of the “BamS”. The state has a duty to protect the health of its citizens – “and that includes protecting those who are not vaccinated”. According to the report, Braun fears an increase in the incidence to 850 and thus 100,000 new infections daily by the federal election in September.
Restrictions for the unvaccinated? Yes or no?
CDU Chancellor candidate Armin Laschet said of Braun’s initiative that so far the principle of “tested, recovered or vaccinated” has been applied for relief. “This principle is good,” he continued in the ZDF summer interview, which was broadcast on Sunday evening. Braun’s proposal had to be discussed, Laschet said, but at the same time he restricted: “In the end, I think that civil liberties must apply to everyone if you don’t want to be vaccinated.” He thinks nothing of a duty – instead everything must be done to convince people to vaccinate.
The debate is also a topic in the German newspapers. Here’s how they comment on the issue of restrictions on the unvaccinated:
“New Osnabrück Newspaper”: “While some are in an uproar because of the rising corona numbers, the others throw all vaccination calls to the wind. A vaccination turbo must be switched on. Vaccination is taboo. But the proposal by Chancellor Minister Braun’s to prohibit restaurant visits, for example, should be seriously discussed . Unvaccinated people would at least have to be charged a few euros for rapid tests if they were to be allowed to go to the cinema, theater or the fitness club. Secondly, quickly comprehensible criteria for containment measures are required. The incidence has served its purpose as the sole yardstick. Half of the population is vaccinated, Almost all of the particularly endangered people are. So higher corona numbers are acceptable. “
“Southgerman newspaper”: “The fourth wave is already developing, you can already feel its pull. Because vaccinated people rarely transmit the virus, this wave is mainly driven by the unvaccinated. And only with the help of an impressive vaccination quota can it be prevented from assuming destructive proportions. In a few months all measures will be able to fall. Then the unvaccinated can lead a normal life again. Everyone can decide to wait until then. But then he has to. “
“Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”: “… Instead of swinging the club of the (partial) mandatory vaccination as in France and Greece, Merkel’s confidante wants to show millions of people who are unwilling to vaccinate the advantages of the syringe when it comes to corona issues. A rapid test that is not necessarily safe will soon not be enough More to go to a Bundesliga game with (vaccinated) friends or to go out to eat. It would be a compulsory vaccination through the back door, because it forces citizens to get vaccinated if they want to continue to participate in social life. But it would also lead to the pandemic drying up due to a high vaccination quota. The political explosives CDU politician Braun is using is not only made clear by the violent protests of anti-vaccination campaigners in Athens and Paris against similar plans. … “
“The world”: “The advances are not well thought out. Vaccination refusers are hardly convinced with such interpretive ideas. First vaccinated people who have missed the second date because of their vacation, for example, are not reached because they are now on vacation. The parties, however, really get caught without them visible, imminent danger in a fundamental discussion about freedom and bondage, which is as hypothetical as it is a hindrance. It is hypothetical because the proof of vaccination success against possible new mutations cannot be provided at the moment. It is a hindrance because such a fundamental dispute with all leads his great rhetorical positions fairly quickly to high moral steeds, from which it becomes difficult in the election campaign. “
“Frankfurter Rundschau”: “The dispute with those unwilling to vaccinate must be carried out now – even if this does not seem opportune to everyone in the election campaign. If the virus and the Delta variant continue to rampant, the probability that there will be further mutations increases – perhaps also those that against which the previous vaccine is insufficient. The vaccinations against the coronavirus are a race against time. Chancellor Helge Braun (CDU) is right when he starts a debate about how to deal with high numbers of infections in autumn. Why should Politics Vaccine skeptics: do not openly say that in case of doubt there could be restrictions for unvaccinated persons? Perhaps also to those from which they – depending on the current risk assessment – cannot free themselves. At least one thing must be made clear: from a certain one At that point, those who turn down vaccination offers will also have to pay for tests themselves. “
“Südwest Presse”: “Compulsory vaccination would be a further encroachment on individual freedom. Well-founded, because there are no legitimate doubts about the effectiveness and usefulness of vaccines, and yet it is not the job of the state to force someone to be happy Critical to be considered are state guidelines that mean that only those who have been vaccinated are allowed to participate in social life. Those who do not want protection endanger one person in particular: themselves. If everyone who wants is protected, the state should withdraw Because then he has done his duty. “
“Hannoversche Allgemeine Zeitung”: “Is Braun trying at this point to put pressure on people unwilling to vaccinate? Probably so. But a manageable amount of pressure must also be permissible in such a threatening situation for society. The state has a responsibility for all citizens – not just for them Some people may react to advertising and incentives. Others may reconsider their position when it becomes clear to them that they are personally disadvantaged. “
“Reutlinger General-Anzeiger”: “Union Chancellor candidate Armin Laschet reacted immediately and rejected the attempt to discriminate against vaccination opponents. Nevertheless, he has the damage. Because once again it has been shown that the coordination between the Chancellery and the campaigner Laschet did not work well. It only happened a few months ago Braun caused a lot of trouble with the uncoordinated proposal to suspend the debt brake. Apparently the Union has not learned from it. “
“Heilbronn voice”: “It’s almost strange. Up and down the country a few months ago there was criticism that far too little vaccine was available. Now it is there, and many do not want it. A new era had begun with vaccinations. Now we are fighting the virus in advance and no longer run after it, often powerless. Given the high legal hurdles alone, there will certainly not be a general compulsory vaccination in Germany anytime soon. But it is also clear that unvaccinated people will have to be prepared for certain restrictions in everyday life More than a year and a half after the start of the pandemic, there must be an end to shimmy from one lockdown to the next. “
“Free Press”: “People who do not want to be vaccinated therefore run a certain risk in times of spreading infections. The freedom that some rely on restricts that of others. At least if Corona should become rampant again. Politicians have long been aware of this. They are trying to increase the vaccination rate with carrot and stick. The differences in the requests to speak are, however, minimal. Yes – CDU boss Armin Laschet has opposed compulsory vaccination on ZDF and thus against current head of the Chancellery, Helge Braun. He had warned of high incidences in autumn and brought more freedom for vaccinated people into play. Laschet, on the other hand, fears the explosive power of the term vaccination obligation. A look at France shows: Not entirely wrong. Nonetheless, the candidate for Chancellor let himself be a back door open: If the vaccination rate in autumn is still too low, one has to think further. After the federal election – he said at the time t. A candidate for chancellor can certainly not not communicate. “
“Stuttgarter Nachrichten”: “Nobody knows what tasks future virus variants from Epsilon to Omega will pose. In this respect, it is right to increase the pressure on vaccinators. Those who do not have a sufficient vaccination status will only be onlookers at a number of activities by autumn at the latest It is about nothing else when Kretschmann speaks of compulsory vaccination. After all, preschoolers are not led to measles vaccination by force of arms, but are excluded from kindergarten without being vaccinated.
“Rhein-Zeitung”: “The possibilities of the state to significantly increase the vaccination quota have not yet been exhausted. The vaccination campaign has stalled over the summer holidays, it should now be fully switched on again. Among the unvaccinated are not only opponents of vaccinations or skeptics. Many are too comfortable The reluctance to vaccinate among migrants is also noticeable. It could also have something to do with language deficits. However, it is not clear why those who do not want to vaccinate continue to receive free PCR or rapid tests. Those who do not want to be vaccinated should pay for the tests themselves in the future. “
“General newspaper”: “It is therefore legitimate if, in case of doubt, only those who have made all this possible no longer have to endure restrictions – if, yes, if everyone has received a vaccination offer and all the fickle have received the support they need. Against this background, can everyone can decide for himself what he does. At some point it will finally be so far that the restrictions will fall for everyone. And then the unvaccinated will also enjoy the freedom. Until then, however, each individual is free to make his own decision. Is different that with a compulsory vaccination, which nobody really wants. Because this would be nothing more than state compulsion. And the encroachment on personal rights would simply be too great. “
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
