Olaf Scholz insulted Joe Chialo: from court jarries and hypocrisy

Olaf Scholz referred to Joe Chialo at a birthday party as the CDU’s court fools. The Chancellor defends himself against the accusation that he wanted to racially insult Berlin’s cultural senator because of his black skin color. In the meantime he has called Chialo. The excitement was great, the hypocrisy too.

Scholz made a mistake, also because he did not apologize. But regardless of how to evaluate your behavior, the Berlin company from politics and media shows itself in this story as a whole from its particularly hypocritical side. Yes, I’ve been part of it for many years. And sometimes it contradicts me.

The entrepreneur Harald Christ organized the birthday party. Christ once tried to go to politics, was a member of two parties and knows a lot of people. Around 300 guests were invited to his birthday, politicians, journalists, celebrities.

I once dealt with Harald Christ, 16 years ago. The SPD candidate for Chancellor Frank-Walter Steinmeier had appointed him to his competence team. We had a longer, friendly conversation. Since then we have not met. I still received personal invitations to events. Perhaps the networker is only a sociable person, it is probably his business model. I didn’t go there.

Even at Christ’s birthday it is obvious that not all invited friends were, but some only important and Adabeis. But of course Christian can invite who he wants. In his greeting, he asked “that personal discussions are not reported publicly”. That was honorable, but also naive.

What we are with the editor -in -chief of the “Focus”, who made the story public. He apparently wrested with him about ten days and nights whether he should ignore the private character of the evening. Then he did it, of course not because it is a horny story a few days before the election that clicks great, keep God, but because he wants to protect Germany from a chancellor who is not worthy of his office. Or something like that. You can break confidentiality for that, right?

Anyone who was traveling with Olaf Scholz knows that he does not talk as dominated as in public beyond the protocol. In it, he differs from his predecessor, who was consciously a chancellor 24 hours a day and always left the journalist rounds in good time before she could only get in the risk of saying something unintelligible.

Scholz is more carelessly, often for the benefit of journalists because they experience something, sometimes for their damage because he also divides. I have never experienced a personal insult. Incidentally, I believe that you can also set up a stop sign for the Chancellor if he is drawn.

That is astonishing to all the reports from the Christian birthday: a lot has been written, tells and whispered about the unfly that Scholz is said to have spread. However, I have heard nothing of it or read that someone would have contradicted the Chancellor. Only Chialo himself held against it and then removed.

Funny, right? When Scholz ‘behavior was objectively as racist, as everyone finds now, why did nobody, sorry, open their mouths? What about the journalists? The editor -in -chief of the “Focus” said. But apparently nobody said anything. Take a look, we don’t know that.