For expert Mölling, SPD manifest

“The support of Ukraine in its international law claims must be linked to the legitimate interests of all security and stability in Europe.” This claim to the federal government from the manifesto that has been circulating since Tuesday of some predominantly left-wing SPD politicians has sharply criticized security expert Christian Mölling. “This is total madness under international law,” said Mölling, Senior Advisor at the Brussels Think Tank European Policy Center, in the latest edition of the star– s “Die Lage -International”. Ukraine’s claim to its occupied territory should not be declared a negotiating mass for Russia, because: “The right to this territory exists independently of other things.”

With their demand, the signatories of the manifesto moved away from the basics of the peace movement. Because it amounts to a dangerous principle: peace through injustice. “This is about saying that Russia has legitimate security interests,” continued Mölling. “That is what Russia has repeated for years: that these legitimate security interests lead to an offensive war against Ukraine.” This propaganda representation of the Russian leadership, the signatories of the SPD manifesto of ex-parliamentary group leader Rolf Mützenich to defense experts Ralf Stegner to the former Federal Finance Minister Hans Eichel according to Mölling’s view “adopted”.

According to security expert Mölling, the growing loss of territories of the Ukrainian army in the east of the country are also a result of deficits in the military leadership of Ukraine. “False priorities were set last year. One has not focused on effectively expanding the lines of defense.” That now leads to high losses. However, the increasing use of drones had significantly difficult for Ukraine in the course of the war at the beginning of the war at the beginning of the war.

The announcement of the United States for the deduction of military personnel and embassy staff from the Middle East considers Christian Mölling in the context of the smoldering conflict around the Iran’s nuclear program to be a serious warning signal. “We shouldn’t think now: It won’t be that bad,” says Mölling with a view to the increasing probability of an Israeli military strike against Iran. He was further of the opinion that the US government does not want an armed conflict with Iran. But: “If Iran does not move in the ongoing negotiations, then Israel can probably no longer stop. The Americans know that too.”