The institution-related vaccination obligation should come in principle – but specific details will remain open even after the Corona summit of the federal and state governments. That causes upsets.
The controversial partial vaccination is to come. Just how exactly? This causes question marks and upsets, especially in Bavaria, Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt. At the Prime Minister’s Conference on Wednesday, the federal states led by the Union again expressed reservations about the implementation of compulsory vaccination for employees in the German health and care sector in protocol declarations.
The Saxon state government recorded the process of weighing up the enforcement of compulsory vaccination and ensuring care in health and care facilities “leaving it to the municipal level alone creates a lack of understanding and frustration”.
The purpose of the institution-related vaccination obligation could also be due to the increased corona infections of vaccinated and recovered by the omicron variant “can no longer be reached at present”, explained the Dresden state government. The corresponding legal situation should therefore be approved by the federal government “to the test” be asked.
Bayern referred to in its protocol statement “numerous open questions” and the “Need for practicable, nationwide enforcement rules”. The handout presented so far by the federal government is “at best a first step”. Securing the supply in the health and care sector must be ensured when enforcing the facility-related compulsory vaccination “absolute priority” receive.
According to its protocol statement, Saxony-Anhalt also saw “important implementation questions remain open”. The handout from the Ministry of Health in Berlin “relevant but non-binding”. There are still open labor law issues. In the event of implementation, the question of ensuring the supply is also unresolved “in regions with high rates of unvaccinated employees in the affected facilities”.
The federal and state governments are waving partial vaccination through
The federal and state governments have agreed on the basic implementation of the controversial vaccination requirement for employees in care and healthcare. However, the final text of the decision leaves specific details open.
Instead it says: “The health ministers of the federal and state governments are in an intensive coordination process with the aim of continuing to ensure care in the affected facilities across the board.”
It is therefore still unclear how employees without the prescribed corona vaccination protection should be dealt with. The resolution only says: “The health authorities have a discretion in the implementation of the measures. A ban on entry represents the last step. Therefore, such bans on entry will not automatically come into force immediately and across the board. The principle of opportunity applies to fine proceedings.” Lawyers understand the technical term to mean the agency’s freedom of action in the event of a threat to public safety and order.
The so-called institution-related vaccination obligation should apply from March 15th. However, there has been a sometimes bitter dispute for weeks. Federal states such as Bavaria, Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt have doubts about the feasibility due to the lack of nationwide enforcement rules. There had also been massive criticism and calls for improvements from many nursing and health associations.
Source: Stern
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
