Once again the referees were criticized at the weekend. Ex-referee Manuel Gräfe sees the DFB as responsible and receives support from Lothar Matthäus for his criticism.
After the highly controversial referee decisions on the Bundesliga weekend, former top referee Manuel Graefe sharply attacked the German Football Association. “It’s time, after the DFB drove refereeing structurally and personally against the wall for twelve years, to ask the question of responsibility,” wrote Graefe in a guest comment in the “Bild” newspaper and added: “If it’s in a club or does not work in a company for years, at some point the management level will rightly be held responsible.”
On Saturday there was again great criticism of the role of the video assistant in the Bundesliga. In the top game between FC Bayern and Borussia Dortmund (3-1), VAR did not intervene after Benjamin Pavard fouled BVB professional Jude Bellingham from the penalty spot. In the 2-1 victory of 1. FC Union at RB Leipzig, however, the VAR reported a kick from Leipzig’s Nordi Mukiele against Berlin’s Niko Gießelmann, but the referee did not revise his decision.
“Too many wrong decisions” for Manuel Gräfe
There were simply too many wrong decisions, some of which were clearly wrong, said Gräfe, who emphasized: “Here we are again with the performance principle, which has unfortunately been at the back of the DFB referee management for a long time. Previously with the bosses Fandel and Krug, today with Fröhlich, Meyer and Drees.” Gräfe, who had to end his career in the summer of 2021 due to the age limit and was therefore in a clinch with the DFB, calls for a “restart without these political influences”. The 48-year-old Berliner proposes the engagement of the former Swiss referee Urs Meier, who can act “independently and performance-oriented”.
Ex-national player Lothar Matthäus agrees. He could imagine former professional footballers being used as support. The proposal is not new. “As former footballers, we can assess it better because we have been in these situations ourselves for years and know what it looks like when you are fouled or fouled. How you fall, where the ball moves when this or that in front of it happens. And most importantly, we see it faster,” Matthäus wrote in a Sky column. The intuition of ex-footballers is different in such cases.
Nevertheless, Matthäus is against abolishing the video referee again. That would be “a step backwards,” said the 1990 world champion: “I think that the bottom line is that more wrong decisions are prevented than before, and there’s still room for improvement.”
Source: Stern
I have been working in the news industry for over 6 years, first as a reporter and now as an editor. I have covered politics extensively, and my work has appeared in major newspapers and online news outlets around the world. In addition to my writing, I also contribute regularly to 24 Hours World.
