Why didn’t Rapallini charge a penalty for River? The precedent that condemns the referee

Why didn’t Rapallini charge a penalty for River?  The precedent that condemns the referee

It was a simple play for the referee fernando rapalliniwhere thanks to technology he could see the clear blow of Barreto in the face of Borgia inside the area with the repetitions of the VAR. However, to everyone’s surprise, the referee decided not to take the penalty and instead marked it as a corner.

Outraged, the players of River they went up in smoke rapallini to protest what was obvious. To top, Frank Armaniteam captain, was reprimanded by the judge.

image.png

The precedent that condemns Rapallini: same play, different ruling

The most curious thing about this situation is that a few weeks ago, on July 3, River lost 3-2 to Hurricane with the arbitration of rapallini. That night, the “Millionaire” played from 20 minutes with one less player due to the expulsion of Jonathan Maidana.

What happened? On a split play, the defender of River Y Coccarofront of Hurricane, disputed a ball against the side. The “Globo” attacker grabbed him by the shirt and maidana he brushed it off with his arm. Coccaro he collapsed on the floor exaggerating the blow.

next act, rapallini was called by him VAR and went to see the play on the monitor. After a couple of repetitions, he decided to apply a hard and conclusive ruling: expel maidana.

The reactions in the networks against Rapallini:

embedded

embedded

embedded

embedded

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts