Both defendants had been dismissed in the first instance, but the prosecution decided to appeal the ruling before the Federal Chamber.
The judges Martin Irurzun and Eduardo Farah They were in charge of confirming the dismissals and the prescription of the complaint.
“No element is in the record -nor specifically has it been provided by the complainant- that allows sustaining” the sustainability of the appeal made by Mavys Álvarez and his lawyers.
Why is the case prescribed against Maradona’s environment? The judges allege the antiquity of the facts as one of the main factors: “Taking into account the heaviest penalty provided for in the indicated regulations (from 15 to 20 years in prison) and the date on which fact-finding would have ceased (January 19, 2002), it must be concluded that to date the prescription of the criminal action has operated”
The case against Maradona was already filed
Judge Daniel Rafecas ordered the closure of the case six months ago, since the facts “they would have been made mainly by Maradonawith the secondary participation of the rest of his collaborators between November 9, 2001 and January 19, 2002″.
The main reason for filing the case, according to Rafecas, was the number of obstacles presented in the investigation that prevent a correct process. due to the death of Maradona on November 25, 2020.
“Any criminal action against you is extinct, according to art. 59 section 1 of the Penal Code”, was explained in the ruling drafted and presented in March of this year.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
