Later, the same medium developed: “Once again Uruguay played half an hour to win, but lost control and Argentina thrashed it.”
And in another section he stressed that “Uruguay had a bad time against Argentina” and also “got bogged down in the table and in their good intentions.”
For its part, the newspaper El País in its paper edition put on the cover: “Uruguay overwhelmed.”
“Enough, Guys! La Celeste had a bad time in Buenos Aires and was beaten,” the same newspaper expanded in its sports supplement Ovación.
In the online edition of Ovación they highlighted the good start of the team led by Oscar Washington Tabárez but lamented the lack of efficiency.
“The problem of Uruguay: his proposal does not allow him to hold more than half an hour,” said one of the main notes.
And in another they remarked: “A constant: Celeste plays very well the first 30 minutes, but if it does not score, it is exposed. Once it was worn out, Argentina was lethal and could even win for more.”
The sports site Tenfield topped its online front page with the headline “Hard Classic Defeat.”
In the analysis, it was stressed that “Muslera’s error opened the Argentine recital.”
“The truth and reality is that Argentina spared his life. He won by three goals, he could well do it by four, five, and so on,” recognized the renowned Uruguayan sports portal.
And about the end they warned about Uruguay’s next game that will be on Thursday against the leader Brazil in Manaus.
“Black Sunday in Buenos Aires. And nothing less than Brazil is coming,” they closed.
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
