Leopoldo Luciano Luque (40):
Neurosurgeon. He is the main defendant in the case because for the prosecutors he was Maradona’s family doctor. He signed the release of the Olivos Clinic to take him to home hospitalization.
What they accuse him of:
– “Luque, in his capacity as family doctor, violating the rules of the good art of healing which he ultimately despised because he had full knowledge of the symptoms presented by the patient in the last period, avoided attending and / or at least promoting due medical attention to Diego Armando Maradona “.
– “He did not guarantee his due follow-up with cardiological controls and studies, nor did he summon specialists in cardiovascular, liver and kidney matters, as his condition required, leaving his fate to his own devices.”
– “In a systematic way, he ignored and underestimated the symptoms and signs compatible with heart failure that were reported to him by people outside the medical team and that he personally had the opportunity to evaluate.”
– They also assure that Luque did not make “a clinical history of the victim” nor did he establish “the relevant data on the patient’s diagnosis, therapy and illness.”
– “Faced with the warnings of the patient’s state of health regarding his swelling and the certain possibility that he was developing an acute lung edema, he refrained from acting” and despised “the clear signs that announced the risk of death.”
In addition to the homicide, he was charged with “use of an adulterated private document” for requesting a medical record of “10” with a forged signature of his patient.
Agustina Cosachov (36):
It was Maradona’s psychiatrist. For prosecutors it is another of the main defendants in the case. She was in charge of prescribing the psychiatric medication that the Gymnastics DT was taking and was one of those who signed the Olivos Clinic’s discharge.
What they accuse her of:
– “Having full knowledge of the cardiac pathology (…) he did not adopt the appropriate precautions”.
-They attribute to him “not imposing limits on the sufferer.”
– “It did not ensure the correct administration of the medication and psychotropics (…), ignoring the adverse effects and avoiding the controls and / or appropriate studies for the purposes of its evolution”.
– “He avoided the corresponding assistance by expressly withdrawing the therapeutic companions, at the same time that he impeded the attendance at the home of a clinical doctor and a nutritionist”.
-He moved away “from the place where he was carrying out the home stay, without adopting a contingency plan and adequate follow-up to the case.”
– “The accused, having the real possibility of avoiding the situation of objective danger that her behavior created, given the result that was presented as foreseeable and avoidable, remaining indifferent to the serious shortcomings pointed out that she did not tend to reverse, unscrupulously assumed the risks that Maradona’s health was running, and the consequences that this could generate “.
– “He also failed to personally take care of the resuscitation of the patient.”
They also charged her with “ideological falsehood” because they attributed her having drawn up a certificate of Maradona’s mental aptitude without having gone to visit him.
Carlos Ángel “Charly” Díaz (29):
It was Maradona’s psychologist. He entered the medical staff hand in hand with the lawyer and representative of “10”, Matías Morla. He is considered one of the members of the “treating medical team.”
What they accuse him of:
– “He omitted to be admitted to a suitable rehabilitation center as stipulated and authorized by current laws.”
– “The field of professional performance of the psychiatrist Cosachov became involved, and even advocated making decisions until then outside her professional responsibility”.
– “His decision-making power over the person of Diego Armando Maradona transcended the purely medical, to extend to the patient’s relationships with his relatives.”
-They accuse him of “manipulating” the family “by proposing that everything that was happening was the product of Maradona’s free and spontaneous decision, claiming that he ‘needed space'”.
“It did nothing more than hide the information regarding the true health condition of the deceased, thus avoiding that outside the medical team could have taken measures to reverse the noted shortcomings and, consequently, to avoid the fatal outcome, with which he clearly collaborated “.
– “He omitted to carry out the visits and the follow-up of the patient in a timely manner.”
-And they attribute to him a “blatant indifference of his conduct in the face of the emergency situation and the possibility of the result of death.”
Nancy Edith Forlini (52):
Physician in charge of the Home Care Management of the Swiss Medical company. She was the coordinator for the prepayment of Maradona’s home hospitalization.
What they accuse her of:
– “He failed to comply with the minimum duties in his charge, among which was, according to the patient’s chart, to provide the place with the nursing staff specialized in mental health, therapeutic accompaniment, nutritionist, and the adequate apparatus for CPR advanced, laboratory studies and electrocardiogram -among others- none of which it supplied “.
– “He omitted to analyze whether the house met the minimum conditions for a patient with Maradona’s physical limitations.”
– “In full knowledge of the deficient nursing service (…) he omitted to take any action, thus being functional to the behaviors carried out by the remaining defendants, as a result of which the aforementioned fateful result was produced, which inescapably had to be represented for the condition he held “.
Mariano Ariel Perroni (40):
He was the coordinator of nurses for the company “Medidom”, subcontracted to provide nurses and doctors to Maradona’s home hospitalization.
What they accuse him of:
– “Having full knowledge of what was done and what was not done, especially the nurses’ handling of the patient, he completed the forms of the corresponding care, omitting to record his entries in a complete and adequate way, deliberately entering information that It was not consistent with the real condition and medical care that Diego Armando Maradona was receiving. “
– “Knowing the dangerous situation that his behavior created, the result appearing as foreseeable and avoidable (…), he demonstrated a disinterested and indifferent behavior in the face of the emergency situation.”
– “After that, with the intention of concealing their actions, the two nurses Madrid and Almirón, in collusion with Perroni, falsely stated on the nursing sheet that the patient had been checked on various occasions.”
Ricardo Omar Almirón (38):
It was the nurse who took care of Maradona during the night and early morning shift.
Dahiana Gisela Madrid (37):
It was the nurse on the morning and afternoon shift. He participated in CPR maneuvers the day Maradona died.
What they accuse both nurses of:
– “They omitted to assist Diego Armando Maradona on November 24 and 25, 2020, knowing his delicate situation and knowing that such an omission would most likely lead to the fatal outcome that finally occurred.”
“In clear complicity with the criminal purpose of the plan that the remaining defendants were executing, they carried out checks and / or deficit checks, either because they were not doing them properly or because they failed to even enter the room.”
“The days before they could not notice the signs and symptoms compatible with heart failure that were already evident and detectable.”
“They were the last within a deficient care scheme who had direct contact with the victim, when the agonizing period prior to death had already begun, dating at least 12 hours before death.”
Source From: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.
