Attack on Cristina Fernández de Kirchner: they expanded the accusation of gender violence.

Attack on Cristina Fernández de Kirchner: they expanded the accusation of gender violence.

October 23, 2024 – 14:04

By majority, the Federal Oral Court 6 agreed to include the aggravating circumstance of gender violence in the context of political violence.

Reuters

The judge Sabrina Namer and Judge Ignacio Fornari They granted the claim of the prosecutor Gabriela Baigúnto which the complaint was later added, because it was understood that new elements emerged so far in the oral trial to expand the qualification. The decision, which complicated the procedural situation of the accused, was announced at the hearing this Wednesday.

The prosecutor had argued that the framing of the case established in the investigation stage was not appropriate and that, based on the investigation of Fernando Sabag Montiel and the testimonials of the victim and the custodian William Gallo and Cristina’s secretary, Diego Bermudez New elements of evidence were released to include the figure.

After several complaints from Public Ministryfinally the Court accepted the new qualification. However, he reported that he will not define in this instance whether the new figure will apply to all the accused. In that sense, he asked the prosecutor Gabriela Baigún that at the next hearing determine the procedural facts that led her to claim the aggravating circumstance for each of the accused. The defenses may also argue in this regard.

The controversy over whether the aggravating circumstance is applied or not to all the accused is because the defense of Brenda Uliarte considers that the figure of gender violence is inapplicable to a woman. The lawyers of the head of Los Copitos, Gabriel Carrizo and Fernando Sabag Montiel, meanwhile, consider that there is no new evidence to justify the extension of the accusation and that the claim is untimely.

Uliarte insists

After last week’s episode in which Brenda Uliarte tried to attack one of the defenders, her lawyer Alejandro Cipolla He raised again this Wednesday that his client It is not located in time and space. Despite repeated forensic evaluations that determined that the young woman is sane, her defender insists on the strategy to obtain the non-imputability.

Brenda Uliarte.jpg

Uliarte's defense seeks to declare her insane to seek her immunity from imputation.

Uliarte’s defense seeks to declare her insane to seek her immunity from imputation.

Telam

Therefore, he asked again for a psychiatric evaluation for, according to him, “a supervening disability”. She said that what happened at the hearing on October 16 shows that “she does not understand what is being tried here.” And she demanded a new report from the forensic medical body and not from the Penitentiary Service “to take care of all parties.” at the trial.”He doesn’t understand what’s happening”. Cipolla stated. And he spoke of injuries and self-flagellation, of suicide attempt and the medications he or she consumes.

The Court today warned the SPF agents who guard Brenda at each hearing and demanded greater attention to guard the accused. And he announced that, if another similar event occurred, Uliarte will no longer be able to attend the hearings in Comodoro Py.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts