Justice will investigate Cristian Fabbiani and the streamer Spreen for possible illegal bets

Justice will investigate Cristian Fabbiani and the streamer Spreen for possible illegal bets

November 12, 2024 – 15:51

The influencer played 55 seconds for Deportivo Riestra in the match they tied 1-1 against Vélez Sarsfield.

The Justice decided to investigate “attract bettors on an illegal platform” to the coach Sporty riestra, Cristian Fabbiani and the streamer Iván Buhajeruk, known in the environment as Spreen, who started the game against Velez for the Professional Leaguebut was substituted after 55 seconds without touching the ball.

As confirmed by Public Prosecutor’s Office porteño, the Prosecutor’s Office Specialized in Games of Chance (FEJA)in charge of Juan Rozas, “a case was initiated ex officio to investigate whether yesterday, on the occasion of the football match between Riestra and Vélez, the coach and Spreen “their purpose was to attract bettors on illegal platforms.”

spreen-riestra (debut.jpg

The prosecution has already asked the Judicial Investigation Corps (CIJ) for evidentiary measures.

The influencer was a starter in the match in which “Malevo” received at the stadium Guillermo Laza to the championship leader, Velez Sarsfield. It was all a marketing campaign, powered in large part by the Speed ​​energy drink. Finally, The Bajo Flores team apologized.

The action raised a lot of controversy, and even several local football protagonists criticized what happened, such as the Vélez forward Brian Romerothe president of Estudiantes de La Plata, Juan Sebastián Verón, and the River side, Marcos “Huevo” Acuña.

The AFA opened an investigation into Riestra for the Spreen tremer episode

The Ethics Court of the Argentine Football Association (AFA) opened a file against Deportivo Riestra for the inclusion of the streamer Spreen in the match that tied 1 to 1 against Vélez, and will investigate whether it was “or“illegal, immoral, or unethical behavior.”

The decision was communicated in Bulletin Number 6587, where they announced that it was resolved ““open the file and request the intervention of the investigative body of this Court for the corresponding purposes.”

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts