Loan case: new chats that point to an “express kidnapping that went wrong”

Loan case: new chats that point to an “express kidnapping that went wrong”

New chats came to light this Saturday in the framework of the disappearance of Loan Peña in Corrienteswho was last seen on June 13 of last year. The family lawyer revealed new details about the investigation, trying to clarify once and for all what really happened with the child.

“What was done these three months is an important legal work. Today we have all these prosecuted people, there are sufficient evidence to consider seven people and another 10 for cover -up“Juan Pablo Gallego explained in dialogue with C5N.

Gallego also insisted that Loan remains in the same province where he disappeared: “The figure of the loss was raised by Laudelina, here no child was lost, here there was something deliberate. We have rebuilt, that Loan falls into a trap with his dad, in the house of Grandma Catalina, where Laudelina was Ama and Lady. “And added: “I am convinced that we are going to find it. Today these people are convicted of the crime of subtraction and concealment.”

The new chats that add to the investigation by the disappearance of Loan

As for the new chats that arose, the lawyer revealed that “Laudelina knew that Caillava’s marriage had Loan and claimed what time they were going to return it”. Under that framework, he indicated that everything would be a “Express kidnapping plan that went wrong”, since the conversation showed that both (María Victoria) Caillava and Pérez were going to retain the 5 -year -old boy a couple of hours in a neighboring town.

In this way, Gallego revealed the existence of a conversation between Laudelina and Caillava, where he asks him to return to his nephew.

“We have the quasirteza that they could not get him out of currents, If at some point they tried to do it, which I doubt. Our suspicion, and I have been saying it, revolves around (Carlos) Pérez and (María Victoria) Caillava. I have no doubt that they are the ones who took it, “said the lawyer previously.

According to Gallego, The seven detainees -Pérez and Ramírez, along with accused of child abduction and currently processed with preventive detention, along with Caillava, Antonio Benítez, Mónica del Carmen Millapi, Laudelina Peña and Walter Maciel- They are the final authors of subtraction and kidnapping. Gallego explains that “the sexual delivery of a child in exchange for an economic benefit” is common in Corrientes.

“There was never a narco track or a situation that links trafficking in people,” he said, although he also suspects that sexual abuse could have occurred, he told Infobae. “If there was abuse, the suspicions are on Pérez, and in the second instance, about Ramírez. But the most logical thing seems the figure that Ramírez gives it to Pérez and disappears from the scene, “he explained.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Jan Ullrich from Auto and injured

Jan Ullrich from Auto and injured

Jan Ullrich had planned TV appearances in the coming days. Instead, the former Tour-de France winner had to go to the hospital. According to a