A renowned forensic warned a possible scientific error in the ruling that released Dani Alves for sexual abuse. The Prosecutor’s Office already has the report.
The case Dani Alves Turn back the controversy. A renowned forensic assures that the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) could have made a mistake to the interpret a key test in the ruling that acquitted the former player player for sexual aggression.
The content you want to access is exclusive to subscribers.
Days ago, the TSJC left the sentence that the audience of Barcelona had imposed on Dani Alves (four and a half years in prison) and declared it innocentwithdrawing all the precautionary measures against him. The sentence, which generated strong controversy, was based on the alleged lack of reliability of the testimony of the complainant. However, a new element could question part of the judicial reasoning.


However, Antonio Alonsoformer director of the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences, He presented a writing before the Prosecutor’s Office in which he warns about a possible scientific interpretation error that would have influenced acquittal. According to the report, the court used as an argument the presence of Esmegma in the victim’s mouth to support the version of Alves, who said The complainant made a fellatio. The woman, however, He flatly denied it.
What Alonso raises in his writing is that the analysis does not allow those remains to correspond to Esmegma or confirm the former soccer player. Details that the particles found They were very smallcontain Alves DNA, but did not present their own indications of Prostatic secretions. He even warns that contact could have been produced by other waysas Share a glass.
The failure under forensic magnifying glass
Although this report does not imply that acquittal opens, opens a new legal debate front. It is a technical observation that points against one of the elements that the TSJC used to question the credibility of the complainant. The Prosecutor’s Office must now evaluate whether a revision of the ruling corresponds or if the decision is maintained as it is.
Source: Ambito

I am Pierce Boyd, a driven and ambitious professional working in the news industry. I have been writing for 24 Hours Worlds for over five years, specializing in sports section coverage. During my tenure at the publication, I have built an impressive portfolio of articles that has earned me a reputation as an experienced journalist and content creator.