Through a recently published statement, the modifications implemented on these points were known.
After negotiations with the opposition, he Government he backed down with the most controversial points of the omnibus law and revealed the changes it recently introduced.
In that framework, the culture There were several points in which the ruling party finally gave in, such as with the reduction of the modifications to the National Institute of Cinema and Audiovisual Arts (INCAA) and the setback in the closure of the National Fund for the Arts (FNA).
“The culture chapter was redesigned, protecting the sector’s resources, but preserving the objective that administrative expenses are not an excessive burden and with institutional redesigns in the proposal to modernize the FNA (whose closure is no longer encouraged) and INCAA”, details the document published by the Government.
The specific allocation for the INCAA is maintained
With respect to INCAA, The resolution marks that the modification of article 21 is repealed and The specific allocation for the National Institute of Cinema and Audiovisual Arts is maintainedwhich would continue to receive an amount of resources automatically.
They propose exploring favorable economic mechanisms for the National Endowment for the Arts
As for the National Endowment for the Arts, the writing specifies that yesand stops promoting its closure and proposes to “explore mechanisms so that its economic equation is more favorable to the artistic community.”. In this sense, directors must be ad-honorem and expenses cannot represent more than 20% of their income.
After actors and artists rejected the articles of DNU 70/2023 and the Omnibus Law that repeal laws referring to the support of cultural industries, President Javier Milei insisted that “there is no money” and stressed that The Government must choose between “financing films that no one watches” or “feeding people.”
It is worth remembering that the Argentine Society for the Management of Performing Actors (SAGAI) published an emotional video in which renowned national actors and actresses participated, who highlighted that the entity “protects the intellectual rights of thousands of artists” and “does not receive any type of contribution from the State.” “They are not privileges, they are rights.”
Precisely, one of the protagonists of the video is Adrian Suarwho also criticized the disinvestment in the National Institute of Cinema and Audiovisual Arts (INCAA) and was against the omnibus law. “You “You can disagree, what you can’t do is lie to people,” responded to Milei this Monday.
Source: Ambito
I am an author and journalist who has worked in the entertainment industry for over a decade. I currently work as a news editor at a major news website, and my focus is on covering the latest trends in entertainment. I also write occasional pieces for other outlets, and have authored two books about the entertainment industry.
