Senator Manini Ríos expressed at a press conference what are the concerns that the Cabildo Abierto has before approving the law in Deputies.
Guido Manini Riossenator for Town meetingpresented the conditions for the coalition to vote in favor of the social security reform, and remarked that the Executive power You should take this into account otherwise it is very likely that they will vote against; the project will be voted on this week in committee so that, later, it reaches the plenary in Deputies.
This Monday the senator for Cabildo Abierto, hours before the meeting between ruling party deputies to finalize details of the social security reform, remarked that if the government does not show flexibility to the party’s demands, it is likely that they will not vote for favor of the law “If there is no answer, there is no easingWell, if there is no progress on this issue, we have already said it for a long time, we want these things to be addressed and we understand that it is important to consider our proposals”, highlighted Manini.
Among the conditions that Manini listed in the press conference are, in the first place, the “enablement of the AFAP to take money from the Uruguayans.” The senator stated that “That money is not from the AFAP” and that it is risky to take it out of the country and the possibility that it can be placed in the financial market, which seems risky to the party.
“We understand that the capital of Uruguayans must remain in Uruguay to stimulate national work, micro, small and medium-sized national companies that never have enough oxygen to survive. Here all the benefits are given to the large companies that come from abroad, but we forget about the national work, about the great generators of jobs, ”he established.
Secondly, the other point that interests the Cabildo Abierto for approval in Deputies – the project already has the approval of the Senate – is the reduction in the years it takes to make the calculation of retirement in retirement where 25 years are proposed. “We think that taking him to 25 years, to someone who contributed 30 years, is to introduce him into the average of his calculation of having very low retirement salaries, the first of his career. We think that this is good for us. That period must be shortened. We propose 15 yearswhich is already more than at present, but which is definitely different from 25”, explained Manini.
Source: Ambito
