Gisella Dahiana Madrid will be the first of the accused to be tried. According to the lawyer, he is responsible for “abandonment followed by death.”
Almost four years after the death of Diego Armando Maradonathis Wednesday the trial against the nurse will begin Gisella Dahiana Madrid, accused of “homicide with possible intent”and Mario Baudrylawyer and partner of Verónica Ojeda, pointed out that the woman is responsible for the incident for not having done anything to prevent it.
The content you want to access is exclusive to subscribers.
In dialogue with Agencia Noticias Argentinas, the lawyer considered that the accused is guilty of the crime of “abandonment followed by death” because She was hired to take care of the former player and provide him with the best care. This crime provides for a penalty ranging from three to ten years in prison, as established by the Penal Code.
In turn, he confirmed that Ojeda, former partner of 10, will be present tomorrow at the beginning of the jury trial, although Dieguito Fernando, one of Maradona’s sons, will not go to court because “he is very small” because “this makes him bad.” ” and “you have to take care of it.”
“We only ask that there be Justice and that Diego can rest in peace“he added Baudry.
The trial against Maradona’s nurse begins
For his part, the nurse’s lawyer, Rodolfo Baquéhad told this agency that His client is innocent because he never had the intention, fraud or will to kill Maradona. and he stressed that his environment prohibited him from seeing him. “We want the acquittal to be issued,” he emphasized.
The woman is accused of alleged “homicide with possible intent” of the former Argentine player and remarked: “That the prosecution and the complaint launch a campaign to find the real murderers of Maradona (in reference to Luque, Cosachov and Carlos Díaz)”.
“We are the only ones who we want to go to oral trial because the others did not ask for it,” the nurse’s defender insisted, adding: “When (Miguel Ángel) Pierri and Perroni requested this procedure, they were told no because their opportunity had already passed.” Baqué He maintained that when they presented the request, “they abstained from giving their opinion“.
Source: Ambito