The judge Roberto Boico He was in charge of making the decision, who ruled: “I insist on what I anticipated at the beginning: The criticisms presented by the litigator do not objectively support the fear of partiality that invoked after departure. Nor does it have an entity for that solution, what was brought up on the ‘reasons for decorum and delicacy’ that would impose the inhibition of the judge, because- as I remembered in my ruling of 6/6/24- only who (eventually) is excuse Conditions to calibrate to what extent an assumption of moral violence can affect its free and independent decision power. “
“Ercolini loves me imprisoned. I’m sure it’s part. He has demonstrated it in the two causes (the insurance and violence). Let’s get out of formalisms and see what has happened. I’m not paranoid, Ercolini hates me and wants to collect revenge “had declared the ex -president last Monday.
In addition, your lawyer Mariana Barbitta He had exhibited chats between Fernández and Ercolini During the audience, occurred in October 2017 and March 2018. In them, they argued that they had a personal relationship that was then cut, something that boyico decided not to consider since They appeared late, and that there is no phone data “Where the images that the chats would document would have been supposedly captured, which is not known by the holder of the telephone where these images would be recorded.”
“I will just reflect that it is usual (and not exclusive to this cause) that different acts of criminal prosecution are carried out under a climate that reflects different emotions and behaviors. It is even expected that this sometimes happens, given everything that is in Dispute. About a “climate of tension” during the audience.
For its part, Ercolini culminated the rounds of investigative statementsand was enabled to continue with the definition of Fernández’s procedural situation and the rest of the accused. However, this Friday the Federal Chamber will define as a draw if the judge is still commanded by Federal Court 11, where the case in question is filed. If separate, the outcome of it could continue to take.
The cause against former president Alberto Fernández continues
Fernández was investigated on November 27, and now the judge must define his procedural situation and that of the other defendants already investigated, including his former private secretary María Cantero And her husband and “broker” of Insurance Héctor Martínez Sosa, suspected of having been a beneficiary by nation safe in the intermediation of most of the contracts investigated. Crimes are investigated in the management of insurance policies for public bodies.
According to the accusation of prosecutor Carlos Rivol in those hiring between 2019 and 2023.
It is estimated that Martínez Sosa would have charged $ 360 million in commissions with his company, but this figure increases if it is proven that he used other companies linked to his person. Fernández is charged with alleged fraud to the State and negotiations incompatible with the public function.
Both the former president and the rest of the 44 defendants are charged with “having intervened jointly and functionally, approximately between the month of December 2019 and the month of December 2023, in a scheme of collection and distribution of public funds by means of irregular addressing in hiring and intermediation in insurance taken by different public distributions in ´Nación Seguros SA ´ “.
To do this, “a part of those appointed, with the collusion of Fernández, would have operated in the hiring of insurance of various state entities, and especially through the intermediation of individuals and companies between said entities and the insurer ´nación Seguros Sa “, details the imputation.
Source: Ambito
