The recognized The New York Times he returned to the charge in his legal litigation against OpenAI and Microsoftmain investor in the company led by Sam Altman. Now, from the newspaper they accuse the engineers of the ChatGPT creator company having deleted data that the computer Times He had spent more than 150 hours extracting possible evidence.
Despite OpenAI was able to recover much of the data, the newspaper’s legal team assures that key information is still missing, such as the names of the original files and folder structures. He judicial conflict began last year when the Times filed its lawsuit alleging that the companies had used the newspaper notes to train your artificial intelligence tools.
The New York Times’ new accusation against OpenAI
The emergence of new tools Yoartificial intelligence generative generated hundreds of new debates and problems that, 2 years after the launch of ChatGPT, are beginning to resonate. In United States, The New York Times – one of the most recognized newspapers in the world – is in legal litigation against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright on his articles that, according to the complaint, would have been used to train AI tools.
Currently, the case is in the discovery phase. During this instance, both parties must deliver requested documents and information for examination by magistrates and which, later, can become evidence effective. As part of this process, the court in charge of the case demanded that OpenAI show the newspaper its training data.
openai.jpg
OpenAI, led by Sam Altman, faces market monopolization and copyright lawsuits in reference to ChatGPT training
This is a key point in the conflict since the company led by Sam Altman never publicly revealed the data it fed its AI tools. Given the information presented by OpenAI, The New York Times stated that the technology company’s engineers had eliminated the data that the newspaper’s own team had previously collected.
The newspaper’s lawyer, Jennifer B. Maisel, assured that OpenAI acknowledged that the information had been deleted and attempted to fix the issue shortly after being notified. However, despite the work of the engineers of the denounced company, the newspaper’s legal representatives examined the “restored” data and reported that it was disorganized, forcing them to start their investigation from scratch.
Elon Musk expanded his lawsuit against OpenAI to include antitrust claims against Microsoft
In addition to the legal battle against The New York Times, OpenAI is also facing a complaint from Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The South African businessman denounced Samuel Altman’s company for seeking to monopolize the generative Artificial Intelligence market. The lawsuit was filed in federal court located in Oakland, California.
In detail, the lawsuit was expanded to include Microsoft, the largest financial backer of OpenAI currently. The dispute between both technological actors is not new since, in August, Musk had denounced Altman and his company for violating the provisions of the contract by putting profits for “in front of the public good” in the development of AI.
“Never before has a corporation been transformed from a tax-exempt charitable organization to a US$157 billion for-profit gorgon that paralyzes the market, and in just eight years“, the complaint charges. Musk’s goal is to have OpenAI’s license with Microsoft revoked and forced to divest itself of the “ill-gotten” gains.
musk.webp
Musk expanded his complaint and now seeks to confront OpenAI and Microsoft.
In response, the company led by Altman issued a statement in which they assured that Musk’s latest lawsuit is “even more unfounded and exaggerated than the previous ones.” For its part, Microsoft did not comment on the matter.
It should be remembered that in August of this year Musk had already filed a complaint against his competitors. In it, he accused his former partner of violating the provisions of the contract by putting profits before good. public in the effort to advance AI.
In detail, Musk’s text denounces that OpenAI and Microsoft violated antitrust law by conditioning investment opportunities on agreements not to negotiate with the companies’ rivals. Furthermore, he states that the agreement of lExclusive license of the companies amounted to a merger that lacked regulatory approvals.
Source: Ambito
David William is a talented author who has made a name for himself in the world of writing. He is a professional author who writes on a wide range of topics, from general interest to opinion news. David is currently working as a writer at 24 hours worlds where he brings his unique perspective and in-depth research to his articles, making them both informative and engaging.