Constitutionalists suggest sanctioning cameramen who do not comply with the “Levinas ruling” of the Court

Constitutionalists suggest sanctioning cameramen who do not comply with the “Levinas ruling” of the Court

February 12, 2025 – 16:24

Also the Chamber of Labor and Crime expressed their disagreement. Discussion due to competencies of the city’s justice. Constitutional Law Specialist Lawyers warn of disobedience to the highest court.

Mariano Fuchila

The National Chamber of Labor Appeals It also ruled in an extraordinary agreed against the court ruling that forces the sentences of national chambers in CABA to be reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice Buenos Aires.

Labor cameramen demonstrated in disagreement with the application of the “Levinas failure” and they left him embodied in an extraordinary agreed signed on Wednesday. Later, they expressed themselves in the same way from the crime chamber. The situation generates controversies in the decision not to abide by a ruling of the Supreme Court and diverse constitutional lawyers affirmed that the fact may sanctions for the cameramen who seek to avoid the provisions of the highest court.

CAMERA RESOLUTION Nº 4[1].pdf

“The disobedience of Civil Appeals Chamber To the Levinas sentence of the CSJN is very serious. They should be applied the sanctions that correspond to the cameramen who integrate it. How you can expect the justiciables to respect it with such an example, “said constitutional law specialist Daniel Sabsay.

Embed – https://publish.twitter.com/Oembed?url=https://twitter.com/danielsabsay1/status/1889671816588808509&partner=&hide_thread=false

Before, his pair Félix Lonigro argued in tune: “The rebellion of national chambers with a seat in the Federal Capital, against the Court, is an act of poor performance that merits an accusation of the Council of the Magistracy of the Nation, before the jury of prosecution, to each camera.

On Tuesday, the National Civil Chamber He had rejected the application of the Levinas failure and resolved that The sentences of the Chamber the Chamber cannot be reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice (TJS).

Last December, at the edge of the beginning of the Judicial Fair and on the last day of Juan Carlos Maqueda, the Supreme Court He signed the so -called “Levinas” ruling, expected because he re -cements the way for the Superior Court of Justice of the Federal Capital to be a kind of reviewer of the sentences of the ordinary national justice.

Days ago, the judges of the different rooms of the National Chamber of Civil Appeals of the Federal Capital, under the presidency of Omar Díaz Solimine They gathered and signed a forceful repudiation of the Court’s decision.

Amid the debate for the autonomy of the city of Buenos Airesthe Minister of Justice of Buenos Aires, Gabino TapiaHe urged the Supreme Court not to modify his decision and hold the “Levinas” ruling that gives greater power to the jurisdiction governed by Jorge Macri. “The failures are to be fulfilled. The Supreme Court was clear and forceful“Tapia said.

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts