Did Donald Trump forge business documents to gain an advantage in the 2016 presidential election? That’s what it should actually be about. But now the trial revolves primarily around sex, condoms and credibility – with hardly foreseeable consequences.
When Susan Necheles asks her question, she already knows what Stormy Daniels will answer. “You made it all up, didn’t you,” asks Donald Trump’s defender. She speaks loudly, quickly and firmly. “No,” Daniels counters in an angry voice. Of course she would contradict this assumption, whatever else. But in American criminal proceedings, in which a jury ultimately decides, it is not always about what comes closest to the truth. It’s about which side appears more credible than the other – or is least mired in contradictions.
Access to all STERN PLUS content and articles from the print magazine
Ad-free & can be canceled at any time
Already registered?
Login here
Source: Stern

I have been working in the news industry for over 6 years, first as a reporter and now as an editor. I have covered politics extensively, and my work has appeared in major newspapers and online news outlets around the world. In addition to my writing, I also contribute regularly to 24 Hours World.