Dani Alvesformer soccer player Barcelonawas More than a year in provisional prison for the alleged violation of a young woman in the bathrooms of a reserved of a disco in that Spanish city and got provisional freedom after paying a bond of one million euros.
According to the Catalan media, the Criminal Chamber of the Territorial High Court composed of three women and a man considered that the young woman’s testimony is not enough to keep the conviction to the accused and that in this case the right to the presumption of innocence prevails.
In this way, the Superior Court of Catalonia acquitted Dani Alves of the crime of sexual aggression.
They also pointed out that the Brazilian fulfilled the precautionary measures and went to sign the court for the first time since his departure from prison.
The Barcelona audience He had considered proven that the former player had complete sexual relations without consent with a young woman to which he invited a reserved of a disco in that city December 30, 2022.
image.png
The Catalan media indicated that despite the conviction, the Barcelona audience pointed to what he described as a “maladjustment” In the victim’s story, while the woman signed that she was uncomfortable with the former soccer player and that he took him to the bathroom.
However, after sucking the security cameras, the room said it was deduced that there was a “Previous Agreement” To go to the bathroom one after the other, but this mismatch, according to the magistrates, “It does not affect the essential core of the behavior that the former Brazilian international,” And it is not enough to “deprive of credibility to the story of vaginal penetration without consent.”
The discharge of the justice of Barcelona over Dani Alves
As reported Chain serthe Chamber, unanimously, considers that the fact that this first part of the story does not sympathize with the truth in the light of the images that the security cameras recorded, distorting the posterior story of what she maintains that it happened inside the bath of the reserved disco when there were no longer cameras or witnesses.
In addition, he points out: “What has explained by the complainant significantly differs from what happened according to the examination of the recorded episode, the examination of what is not registered, we insist, it has to be particularly rigorous and strict according to the demands of the presumption of innocence to give the accusatory hypothesis accredited.”
“The divergence between what is reported by the complainant and what really happened seriously compromises the reliability of his story. The instance sentence has very relevant valuation deficits and that has not extreme the caution to confront the contents that the probative activity yields”said the room.
In addition, he added that he has not contrasted “The story of the complainant that should be exposed to greater scrutiny with the dactyloscopic or biological test, which support the thesis sustained by defense, neutral and scientific contrast tests.”
“As we said at the beginning, what is stated in the sentence must be reviewed and verified in the second instance”the room culminated.
Source: Ambito

I am Pierce Boyd, a driven and ambitious professional working in the news industry. I have been writing for 24 Hours Worlds for over five years, specializing in sports section coverage. During my tenure at the publication, I have built an impressive portfolio of articles that has earned me a reputation as an experienced journalist and content creator.