The Justice of La Plata denied Toretto house arrest

The Justice of La Plata denied Toretto house arrest

The Justice of La Plata denied this Thursday the request for house arrest to Congratulations Alviteknown on social media as the “Toretto”“The young woman accused of running over and killing the motorcyclist Walter Armandwho is currently detained in the Melchor Romero prison.

The news, decreed by the judge of Guarantees of La Plata Marcela Garmendiawas confirmed by the detainee’s lawyer, Flavio Gliemmowho assured the agency NA who will appeal the decision in the next few hours.

The judge clarified in her ruling that she based her decision on the procedural dangers “basically emerging from the seriousness of the alleged crime and the consequent expected sentence.”

When Alvite was ordered to be held in preventive detention at the end of June, he was informed that there was a possibility that the judge would grant him house arrest.

In light of this, the “Toretto” team of lawyers made a series of requests for their client to be granted this benefit, as she had no criminal record and because she suffered from “panic attacks, episodes of extreme anxiety, stiff hands and hyperventilation.”

Following the Justice’s refusal, which was a “surprise” for the defense, it is expected that Gliemmo will appeal the resolution to get the detainee –who is accused of the crime of simple homicide due to eventual intent– get out of prison and continue the process from home.

What the psychological and psychiatric tests of the “Toretto” revealed

In contrast, in recent weeks, Toretto underwent various psychological and psychiatric tests, after which the professionals produced a report, which was sent to the prosecutor and the judge.

In these analyses, they observed: “No psychiatric signs and symptoms were detected that would lead to the establishment of a psychiatric diagnosis of the type of major psychotic and/or affective disorders.”

Felicitas Alvite the toretto.jpeg

The psychological tests carried out by the “Toretto” showed that “No psychiatric signs and symptoms were observed that would lead to the establishment of a psychiatric diagnosis of the type of major psychotic and/or affective disorders.”

They also noted: “Basic and higher functions do not present any signs that justify the loss of the ability to choose and implement behaviors according to one’s own choices.”

Finally, they concluded that it cannot be done either “a diagnosis of panic disorder, the same with post-traumatic stress disorder.”

In line with that, the judge’s ruling stressed that “is in a position to affirm that the accused presents her critical judgment preserved with full awareness of the situation.”

Source: Ambito

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts