The government wants the reform to be approved as soon as possible, but the discussion within the Multicolor Coalition dilate the processes. In CA they had already expressed their disagreement with some of the points of the project and, in recent weeks, the differences were not settled.
For the space directed by Guido Manini Rios the budgetary definitions of that instance are essential to reach the necessary consensus within the ruling party.
What are the claims of Cabildo Abierto on the pension reform?
As a central requirement for their accompaniment, from CA they demand that the number of years that are taken for the calculation of the replacement rate is lower: while the current project proposes to increase it from the last 10 years –or the best 20– to 25 years, the Manini Ríos space proposes that it should be 15 years.
On the other hand, they expressed the intention that the minimum age established in the file, of 65 years, has more exceptions. In addition, they demand that the Notary Box of the reform and that AFAP cannot invest their funds abroad.
In the Colorado Party they affirm that “nobody can get angry” when they want to discuss some articles
In another space that is part of the government coalition there are also certain objections. In a recent interview with scope.comthe Colorado national deputy conrado rodriguez He assured that they have “some different vision on some articles.”
“As long as the reform maintains the three pillars, we are willing to accompany it. Now, if we see that there are articles that do not include certain cases or deserve to be modified, we are willing to do that job. AND no one can be angry about this”, stated the legislator.
In addition, on the disputed point of the Notary BoxRodríguez proposed a “window period” for five years to “see how it continues to work” and then define whether or not it should be included in the reform.
Source: Ambito
